Compare AI models: deepseek-v4-1-flash-260910 vs MiniMax-M2.7

deepseek-v4-1-flash-260910DeepSeekHollow points use fallbacks · hover for details
MiniMax-M2.7MiniMaxHollow points use fallbacks · hover for details

ReasoningCodingCost efficiencyContext windowMultimodalTool use

Normalized model capability scores
Model	Reasoning	Coding	Cost efficiency	Context window	Multimodal	Tool use
deepseek-v4-1-flash-260910	50/100 — No data; neutral placeholder	50/100 — No data; neutral placeholder	50/100 — No data; neutral placeholder	50/100 — No data; neutral placeholder	50/100 — No data; neutral placeholder	50/100 — No data; neutral placeholder
MiniMax-M2.7	50/100 — Reasoning supported; no comparable benchmark	76/100	59/100	50/100	0/100	0/100

Overview

Author

DeepSeek

MiniMax

Context length

Unknown

205K

Reasoning

Unknown

True

Input modalities

Unknown

Text

Output modalities

Unknown

Text

Providers

DeepSeek

MiniMax

Pricing

Input

Unknown

$0.30/ 1M

Output

Unknown

$1.20/ 1M

Cached input

Unknown

$0.06/ 1M

MomentumLast 2 mo

Unique users

601

49K

Completed sessions

2,725

165,218

Token share

0.02%

Tokens

2.8B+100%

186B-51%

AUG 23OCT 17

RetentionWeek 1

Returning users

Pending

66.1%2.2K user-weeks

Related comparisons. Other model pairs to check.

Nearby alternativedeepseek-v4-1-flash-260910 vs Jamba Minideepseek-v4-1-flash-260910Jamba Mini Nearby alternativeMiniMax-M2.7 vs Jamba MiniMiniMax-M2.7Jamba Mini Related comparisondeepseek-v4-1-flash-260910 vs Jamba Largedeepseek-v4-1-flash-260910Jamba Large Related comparisonMiniMax-M2.7 vs Jamba LargeMiniMax-M2.7Jamba Large